Industries

The platform is common. The agents are not.

Reading a company's documents is the same problem everywhere. What you do with them afterwards is entirely particular to the work.

Is your business one of these

Four conditions, and you will know within a sentence.

Panorithm is not for every business. It is for the ones that run on documents arriving by email, where the system of record is a summary of the truth rather than the truth.

The documents arrive by emailFrom partners, landlords, contractors, clients and suppliers, in whatever format the sender happened to use.
The system of record is incompleteThe CRM has the deal but not the site list. The accounting package has the invoice but not the argument about it.
The same job repeatsMonthly, weekly, per client, per campaign, and a capable person does it because getting it wrong is expensive.
Nobody can see across itBecause the truth is spread over four mailboxes and no single person has all four.

How an agent is put together

The expensive half already exists, which is why yours is affordable.

Reading a document, deciding which mailbox to look in, working out who is allowed to see what, sending a bundle to somebody outside: that is most of the engineering in any agent, and it is identical whatever business you are in. It is built, it is live, and every client sits on the same one.

What gets built for you is the layer on top. That is the part a diagnostic scopes, and it is the only part you pay to have made.

ReadingOpening a PDF, a scan or a photograph of paperwork and getting the supplier, the numbers, the dates and the terms out of it. The same problem in every industry, and the expensive part to build.
FindingDeciding which mailboxes to search, running the searches, and knowing when the answer is not there rather than inventing one.
PermissionsWho may open which kinds of document, and whose mail they may reach. Identical everywhere, and the part nobody wants to build twice.
Handing work outBundling documents to somebody outside the company at a link that expires, with a person approving before anything moves.

What a set of them looks like

One agent per repeated job, not one per person.

Agents attach to a role rather than to a colleague, because the job is the thing that repeats. When your SDR moves on, the quote follow-up does not leave with them, and the person who replaces them starts on the far side of it.

Nothing on that board is built. It is what a roster looks like after two or three rounds of diagnostic, and every one of those would have been scoped, quoted and agreed before a line of it was written. How each one is priced

What never gets reused

Four things that have to be yours, or nobody uses the agent twice.

The vocabularyA media owner's avail is a logistics company's slot is a law firm's matter. An agent that calls it the wrong thing is an agent nobody trusts on the second day.
The templatesYour proposal, your rate card, your report. The output has to arrive in the shape your client already expects, not in ours.
The floorsWhat margin you will not go below, what terms you will not sign, what a compliant tender response has to contain. Rules that live in one person's head until somebody writes them down.
The sequenceWhich job feeds which. Site data has to be right before quoting is worth automating, and building them in the wrong order wastes both.

Your documents are never shared with another client and are never used to build anything for anyone else. The reusable part is the machinery, not your business. How separation between clients works

Where we have gone deep so far

One industry mapped end to end, and we will say it is only one.

Out of home advertisingMedia owners and specialists. Site data, avails, proposals, quoting, campaign reporting, tender monitoring and contract review, written out as ten specific agents in the order they earn their place. None of them is built yet and the page says so. See the workflows
YoursIf your business meets the four conditions above, the platform already fits and the agents are the conversation. A diagnostic is how we find out which ones are worth building rather than guessing at them. How a diagnostic works

Tell us the job that repeats.

If you already know which one it is, say so and we will tell you honestly whether it is worth automating. Some repeated work is cheap to do and expensive to replace.

Start with a diagnostic